Showing posts with label Tesco UK stores. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tesco UK stores. Show all posts

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Walmart's UK ASDA Chain Wins 'Best National Retailer' At Tonight's World Food Awards in London.


Live Blogging: The World Food Awards

Walmart Stores, Inc.'s ASDA grocery and general merchandise chain just won the 'Best National Retailer' in the United Kingdom (UK) award at the 2010 World Food Awards, which is currently going on at the tony Hilton Park Lane Hotel in London.

ASDA defeated Tesco and Sainsbury's for the honor at the annual awards ceremony, which some people like to call the 'Oscars' of British and European food industries.

The awards ceremony focuses on "the best" ethnic (or world) foods available for sale in the United Kingdom and Europe, along with honoring what the judges determine is "the best" food retailer in the UK.

ASDA is the second-largest food and general merchandise retailer in the UK. Tesco is number one. Sainsbury's is the third-largest, just slightly behind ASDA in market share.

Tonight's event is being broadcast globally in over 100 countries by Sony Entertainment Television. In addition to the various awards presented by various celebrities, sports personalities and chefs, the awards ceremony includes performances by a host of musical artists.

In addition to the 'Best National Retailer Award' won by Walmart-owned ASDA, the award's ceremony includes numerous other categories, all focused on various aspects of food retailing, distribution and restaurants.

The categories are:

>Best Independent Retailer
>Best Wholesaler
>Best New Product
>Best Packaging
>Best Marketing Campaign
>Entrepreneur of the Year
>Best Catering Supplier
>Restaurant of the Year
>Lifetime Achievement

You can learn more about the World Food Awards at the website here.

For real time results of tonight's winners, check the World Food Awards' Twitter feed here.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Reader Open Thread: Should Grocers Ban Shoppers From Wearing Pajamas While Shopping?

United Kingdom-based Tesco, the parent company of Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market USA, is making waves at home in Britain over a ban on wearing pajamas that one of its stores, a Tesco Superstore in St. Mellons, Cardiff, enacted last week.

At the Cardiff Tesco store, Elaine Carmody (pictured at left), was escorted out of the store and off the premises by store workers for breaking the new dress code prohibiting the wearing of pajamas (pyjamas in Britain) and other nightwear.

Here's a selection of press clippings about the Tesco store ban on wearing pajamas while shopping.

What quickly became a favorite topic in the British press last week, the Tesco store's pajama ban, is becoming an even more written and talked about topic in Britain this week after the Daily Mail and The Sun newspapers published stories pointing out that one of Tesco's TV commercials in 2007 featured its pitchman, British actor Martin Clunes, dashing into a Tesco store to pick up some milk while wearing a pair of pajamas.

Pajamas and supermarkets

Another irony of the Tesco pajama ban is that many of Tesco's food and grocery stores in the United Kingdom sell clothing, including pajamas and other nightwear. And Tesco sells some very attractive pajamas in its United Kingdom stores - including some you might not be ashamed to wear out in public.

We're all familiar with the age-old "No Shirt. No Shoes. No Service" policy at American fast food restaurants; a policy that seems to have worked well for both the stores and customers. However, we aren't aware of any fast food shops that will refuse to serve a customer wearing pajamas, either in the U.S. or across the pond in Britain.

Those who have or currently work in supermarkets and other retail stores know all to well the variety of dress, and lack of dress, some customers show up in to shop.

Grocery stores particularly are a human laboratory for the sartorial choices and behaviors of consumers. After all, food stores are a crossroads of humanity. Everyone has to eat - and therefore nearly everyone has to shop.

Pajamas and the evolution of cultural dressing norms

In the case of pajamas though, the attire has undergone a bit of a revolution over the last decade or so. In fact, today one can find designer pajamas that look every bit as nice, or even nicer, than some forms of regular day wear.

Pajamas have also undergone a cultural shift as a form of dress, from being strictly bedtime clothing to today being much more general purpose wear. This change goes hand-in-hand with the higher quality and better looking pajamas we mentioned earlier.

For example, many time-pressed mothers might leave their pajamas on while dropping off the kids at school in the early morning, and then perhaps drop into the grocery store after before returning home.

Additionally, ask any college professor, and he or she will tell you that it's not unusual for a number of students to show up in early morning classes wearing pajamas. Some college professors dislike this trend. Others seem to care less about it.

We've even heard of party's and gatherings in which those invited are encouraged to wear pajamas to the event. This signals a cultural shift away from the view that pajamas are attire designed to wear just for bedtime.

Reader Open Thread: Your opinions please

So we ask: With all the cultural changes pajamas have undergone, and are undergoing, as a form of dress, does it really make sense for a retailer like Tesco to ban shoppers from wearing them like its store in Britain has done?

Or do any of those changes matter? Is the Tesco store right to have banned customers from shopping-while-wearing-pajamas?

And even further, we ask: Should all supermarkets ban shoppers from wearing pajamas and other nightwear in their stores?

Tell us what you think on the topic using the comments box below. Opine away.

[Photo Credit: Wales News Service.]

Monday, January 26, 2009

When Social Media Goes Bad - Maybe? Tesco and Waitrose Store Workers in the UK Use Facebook Sites to 'Diss' Store Customers


In this piece yesterday [Twitter Me This Batman: Are You Using Twitter? If Not, You Probably Should Be], we discussed the power for grocers (and others) of using social media and social networking Web sites like Twitter and FaceBook, as well as the use of such sites by a growing number of food and grocery retailers.

But like all new and powerful tools, particularly digital ones, there's also a potential downside to the use of social networking sites by grocers, individuals and other businesses.

Two reports out of the United Kingdom last week make this fact abundantly clear.

The first incident involves our very own (in the sense that we write about it) Tesco, which owns and operates Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market in the Western U.S. A number of UK newspapers, including the Daily Mail and UK Telegraph, reported last week that Tesco corporate executives are investigating an incident in which a number of Tesco store-level employees posted abusive comments about store customers on a "Tesco" discussion forum on the Facebook social networking Web site.

Here are a few of the Facebook comments made by the about 60 Tesco store workers from the story in the UK Daily Mail:

>"Rob Richardson, from Newcastle, moaned about shoppers ‘who keep coming to find you ... even though there’s 20 other staff members about to help them find something’. His reaction? ‘Give me your damn shopping list, you senile old cow, and I’ll do your shopping for you. Just leave me alone!’"

>"One (Tesco store worker), who identified himself (on the Tesco Facebook forum) as Benjamin Clarke, from Leeds, wrote: ‘I had a guy on Saturday ... who complained about the prices of the reduced mini cucumbers from £1.29 to 64p. Hmmm, how expensive. Cheap ****!’He added: ‘I wish these f******s would just stay at home and shop online!"

>"Tesco worker Zara Ashley Earl objected to customers who put their money on the conveyor belt rather than in her hand.‘Do we have some kind of infection that you might catch??? Ignorant b******s ... And they think we are the stupid ones because we work at Tesco.’"

>"And, Tesco store employee Scott Harrop objected to having to serve ‘smelly ppl ... who make me feel sick’." [Note: A Tesco supermarket actually did recetly toss a customer out of a store for having a rather offending odor. Read about it here: Woman horse rider kicked out of Tesco store because she was 'too smelly'.]

None of the Tesco store employees posted the names of the customers on the Facebook page.

Fresh & Easy Buzz confirmed today with a Tesco spokesperson in the UK that the company is looking into the Facebook forum comments made by the store employees, saying the retailer is "taking the matter seriously."

Additionally, according to a Tesco spokesperson quoted in the UK Daily Mail's January 18 story: "A Tesco spokesman said: ‘Facebook is a popular and fun website but if some of our staff have gone too far, we will investigate and take appropriate action if necessary."

The Tesco employees' Facebook group calls itself "Tesco Employees Could Rule The World." It has about 2,000 members. Only about 60 of those 2,000 members made the remarks.

[Read the story, "Red faces at Tesco as dozens of staff post insulting comments about its customers on internet forum," here.]

And Waitrose too...

Ironically, at just about the same time the Facebook comments about customers made by the Tesco workers were discovered on the Web site, similar remarks made by store-level employees of Britain's leading upscale supermarket chain, Waitrose, also were discovered and reported on by the Daily Mail and UK Telegraph.

The Waitrose employees made similar deragatory comments about store customers on a Facebook forum called "Waitrose isn't a supermarket, it's a state of mind," which is a Facebook page devoted to social networking about the grocery chain.

According to a January 21 story in the UK Daily Mail, and another in the UK Telegraph, Waitrose executives are investigating offensive comments made by workers at the Finchley Waitrose store in London, England.

For example, one Waitrose employee called a female customer a "dirty old loon" and said on the Waitrose Facebook site: "You know, the one who you can smell in Fruit & Veg when she is on the drinks aisle," according to the Daily Mail report.

Another worker at the Finchley Waitrose store wrote of his lust for a regular female customer this way: "All the lads know who I mean. The 6ft tall stunner with the massive natural bristols and a boyfriend who looks like he might kill you for looking at her."

The Waitrose employee comments were in response to a question asked on the Website by a fellow store employee. That question asks store employees from Waitrose stores throughout the UK to list what annoys them most about the supermarket. [The Waitrose page was still up on Facebook today.]

In addition to the Waitrose employees of the Finchley Waitrose store that are being investigated by company brass, other store employees from throughout the UK added their own responses/comments to the Facebook question.

Below is what one of those Waitrose store employees, a worker from a store in Manchester, wrote in response to the question about what annoys him most about Waitrose:

His answer: the "Pikey skanks wait till the last minute, gathered around the reduced-stuff bin, or the cake shelves etc, to get the cheapest possible stuff."

Like the Tesco store employees, the Waitrose workers didn't use customer names in their postings either.

[You can read the full UK Daily Mail report: 'Mad, ugly pikeys': Now Waitrose workers use Facebook to insult their customers," here.]

Fresh & Easy Buzz Commentary:

The first basic question one would likely ask about these two situations is why the Tesco and Waitrose store employees used their real names in the posts? The answer is that most people sign up for Facebook using their real names. That's because it's a "friends-type" (like MySpace) social networking site in which people want to connect to each other, and businesses to real consumers, using their real names and identities rather than an assumed screen name. Also, when you post on Facebook you must use the name you signed up with -- your real name -- rather than being allowed to assume an anonymous handle for posting.

The deeper question is why these employees would post deragatory comments -- even general ones without using names -- about store customers when they know a wide-range of people, including their bosses, store customers and company officials, have access to the Facebook sites? But they are employee Facebook sites, and an employee did ask fellow employees what they dislike about the stores, after all.

We will save addressing that broader psychological and sociological question for another time. But we will suggest that for many people, especially those in their teens -to- mid-twnenties, Internet-based social networking is such a common thing that they think nothing about writing whatever is on their mind on their Facebook pages, or Facebook pages of others. It's similar to the question as to why so many folks post near-nude and completely nude pictures on their Facebook and MySpace pages. We will not attempt to answer either of those two questions today since we didn't plan on turning this into a ten thousand word essay. Perhaps we will address those questions another time.

But then again, they didn't use the names of customers. So is it really a big deal?

The good news is that in both the Tesco and Waitrose cases it was only a tiny percentage of the total users who posted the remarks. In reality probably no more, or even less, than would make such remarks verbally in public. The difference of course is that making such remarks verbally and in public would likelymean just a few people would hear them. But such remarks on popular social networking sites like Facebook can be read by millions, including ones bosses, the press and the store customers themselves.

It's really unchartered waters regarding what Tesco and Waitrose management should do, if anything, to these store-level workers. We aren't sure what we would do either. Since it's a first offense perhaps a strong warning will suffice. And, based on a couple inquiries, it appears that neither Tesco or Waitrose -- or most companies -- currently have a clear policy regarding employee postings on social networking sites, accept in terms of some that don't allow any access at all to the sites from the workplace.

It's also not clear legally if and in what ways employers can restrict what employees write on these sites. Employers can restrict access to the sites at work, of course. But what about from at home? After all that's likely where the store workers made the posts since it's not common to have access to a computer while working in-store.

For example, would it not infringe on an employee's free speech to prohibit her from writing while on the Facebook site at home that "she hates smelly customers," not mentioning those customers by name.? Or can an employer permit a store employee from commenting about his lust for a regular female shopper who frequents the store where he works? We think doing so by an employer would be legally difficult to do.

We do suggest that it's not a wise career move for employees to make even general comments like those made on Facebook about customers, particualrly on a Web site devoted to issues regarding the company they work for. Nor is it particularly good for the company's image, which is an image that should reflect on those who work for it and that they should in their behavior contribute to.

But then again, would the issue be viewed the same way if these employees were allowed to use anonymous screen names? After all, it is an employee Facebook forum. One would think that means employees should be allowed to vent on a wide range of subjects, right? Or should there be restrictions? And what about self-restraint? The viewing of Facebook forums can be restricted only to users. We don't know if the Tesco and Waitrose pages are restricted or open. But if not restricting them would be a simple soultion -- perhaps?

Meanwhile, all of those reading this who have ever worked in a supermarket can probably relate to the types of customers mentioned by some of the store workers. Supermarkets are among the most democratic of businesses. People from all walks of life frequent them. And every supermarket has its own cast of regulars -- and characters.

For example, there might be the eccentric retired man who comes in at least twice daily, sometimes perhaps in his PJ's, because he is lonely and loves interacting with the store employees and customers; the forty-something housewife who perhaps gets dressed up to the nines (including wearing a mini skirt skirt and high heels) to go grocery shopping, enjoying the attention she gets from the young male store employees; or the customer who's always complaining about store prices, telling the store workers how he or she can get this or that item at the supermarket down the street for much cheaper, but yet he keeps coming back into the "high-priced" store each week.

When supermarket employees get together it's not uncommon for them to compare notes on these "regulars." That's actually healthy behavior. But it's probably a good idea, when it comes to social networking sites, for supermarket workers to follow that old adage that you need not always say everything in public (or on a social networking site) that you're thinking --especially when that public is the vast one on Facebook.

But on the other hand, since the sites are "employee sites," why shouldn't the workers be able to offer whatever opinions they desire, especially if they avoid using the names of actual customers? It's not such a simple issue.

[Fresh & Easy Buzz welcomes your comments on the Tesco and Waitrose store employees and Facebook, along with any comments you have in general about the use of social networking sites by grocers and other businesses.

Are the Tesco and Waitrose store employees completely out of line in what they did? Or, do they have the right to their opinions on the Facebook pages? Readers, do chime in and offer your comments. We would particularly love to hear from current and past supermarket workers. Fresh & Easy Buzz has numerous Tesco Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market store-level workers who read us regularly. Please chime in as well. You can do so anonymously at the "comments" link below. We encourage all readers of the post to comment.

Just click the "comments" link below. Also, you can e-mail this post to friends and foes alike (yes, a form of social networking) by merely clicking on the little folder at left, below. When you do it gives you a "ready-to-e-mail" template. Just fill it in and click. Don't say anything abusive about us though in your e-mail comments...please:)]

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Feature & Analysis: Tesco is Launching A Major 'Local Foods' Program in the United Kingdom; Why Not Do the Same At Fresh & Easy USA?


Tesco, the world's number three retailer and the number one food and grocery sales market share leader in its home country of the United Kingdom with about 32% of the nation's total retail food sales, is launching what appears to be the biggest local foods sourcing and merchandising program in the UK.

Last year, Tesco opened five new local foods' regional buying and marketing offices in the UK cities of York, Leicester, Plymouth, Peterborough and Horsham, making it the first supermarket chain in the UK to develop such an extensive regionally-based structure designed to procure and market locally-based food and grocery products.

Each of the five local offices has a buyer and marketing person who's jobs are to find and procure high-quality, locally-produced products to sell in Tesco's UK stores.

As part of its local foods procurement and marketing program, Tesco also has started holding "Meet the Farmer" local foods events in its UK supermarkets.

Since Tesco launched the program, called "Local Sourcing", last year, the retailer says it's five regional UK offices have thus far launched over 1,00 new, local food and grocery product lines in its stores, bringing the total number of locally-produced products the retailers sells currently to about 3,000. Tesco also says it's added 90 new local suppliers to its vendor list.

Tesco UK also has an executive in charge of the local sourcing program, Emily Shamma. Ms. Shamma says UK consumers want to buy quality local food and to support local producers by doing so.

Tesco customers also want to buy more local foods to cut down on food miles and the resulting carbon emissions, Shamma says.

Further, UK consumers see locally-produced foods as having overall superior quality to food products imported from elsewhere, as well as liking the idea they can know more about how the local products are produced (because the goods are local) compared to imported food and grocery products.

Tesco plans to further grow its local foods' sourcing and marketing program, according to Ms. Shamma. She says the retailer's goal is to sell more locally-produced food and grocery product lines than any other UK food retailer.

To further this aim, Tesco also has set up a fund designed to help small, local farmers expand their businesses. This is similar to what U.S.-based natural foods' retailer Whole Foods Market, Inc. is doing for small farmers in the United States as a way to promote small-scale agriculture and local food production.

Tesco has put ~1 million-p ($1.95 billion U.S.) in the fund to use to help give local farmers and producers a leg up in expanding their operations.

The British retailer also has created a local technical team in each of the five regional offices. The team offers and provides free help to the local producers in the areas of manufacturing, packaging, quality assurance and marketing. part of the reason for creating these dedicated technical teams is so Tesco can make sure the local producers have the means available to meet the retailer's overall product quality control standards for the goods it sells in its UK stores.

Samma also says Tesco doesn't just want to make local foods available in its stores to wealthy consumers. Rather, the goal is to make local fresh produce for example more affordable so that it's available for UK consumers of all income levels, she says.

Tesco's current goal is to sell ~400 million-p ($780 million U.S.) worth of locally-produced food and grocery products in its stores this year, with a longer-term goal of selling ~1 billion-p ($1.95 billion U.S.) worth of the locally-produced bounty by 2011.

Tesco PLC had gross sales internationally of about $84 billion U.S. in 2007.

The locally-produced products Tesco has introduced in its stores just since last year when it opened the five new regional buying offices range from fresh produce like Yorkshire cucumbers and locally-raised fresh meat, pork and poultry products, to locally-produced ice cream and beer. The local foods initiative is across all store product categories, from fresh and frozen, to refrigerated and shelf-stable.

Tesco's main competitors in the UK--Wal-Mart-owned Asda, Sainsbury's, Morrisons, Waitrose, the Co-op and a couple others--also are to various degrees involved in local foods sourcing and marketing programs. Besides Tesco, probably Waitrose and Sainsbury's, followed by the Co-op, are the second, third and fourth most aggressive in local foods procurement and selling in their respective stores in the UK.

None of these competitors however has created as aggressive and as comprehensive local foods program as Tesco has with its five fully-staffed regional offices. And perhaps they don't need to. There are many ways to procure and sell locally-produced foods in their stores.

However, based on the fact Tesco has added 1,000 new locally-produced products in its stores, and 90 new local vendors to its roster in less than a year, it seems the regional buying office concept complete with the in-house technical teams is working well for the retailer--and for the local farmers and food producers who thus far have been able to get their goods into Tesco's UK supermarkets, which exist in nearly every city and town in the nation.

Tesco's Fresh & Easy USA and local foods

As regular Fresh & Easy Buzz readers are aware, we've argued regularly that one of the weaknesses--both from merchandising and sales aspects--of Tesco's current 61 small-format, convenience-oriented grocery stores in the Western U.S., is that the stores are not localized in terms of their features on a community and neighborhood basis and in their product mixes.

For example, we've suggested that on top of the basic Fresh & Easy store format, the grocery chain add some custom features based on where the store is located.

For example, some Southwestern-oriented and Latin-oriented flair for the Arizona stores as well as custom features in the Southern California stores to reflect the history, culture and demographics of the different regions and communities the stores are located in, rather than taking a cookie-cutter store design approach, which currently is the case.

We've also suggested strongly the Fresh & Easy stores need to sell more locally-produced food and grocery products--foods from California in the Southern California stores, more foods produced in Arizona in those stores.

There are thousands of fresh and shelf-stable locally-produced products available in both states that aren't currently for sale in the Fresh & Easy stores.

We aren't suggesting Tesco bring in thousands of these local products--the Fresh & Easy stores are limited assortment grocery stores after all. Rather, the retailer just needs to add a solid variety of locally-produced food and grocery items throughout store categories--from fresh produce, meats and dairy, to dry grocery, on top of its core fresh & easy store brand and limited number of national brands product mix.

The stores already have some locally-produced products, especially in the fresh produce category by virtue of the fact much fresh market produce is grown in the west. However, the selection is minimal and spotty, especially outside the produce category.

If Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market begins a localization program like we suggest--and like Tesco is doing in the UK--it will find itself creating stronger bonds--and more business--with the consumers in its market regions.

All of the reasons given by Tesco's UK local foods sourcing chief Emily Shamma as to why the retailer is going big with local foods sourcing and marketing in the UK exist equally among U.S. consumers, especially in the Western U.S. where Tesco has its Fresh & Easy grocery stores.

California, Arizona and to a lessor degree Nevada are top U.S. farming states. Further, California's Central Valley is the world's number one agricultural producing region. Residents in these three states love locally-produced foods, and will even purchase them at a slight premium over foods from other parts of the U.S.

California also is the home of the local foods movement and has many food retailers like Whole Foods Market, Raley's, Safeway Stores, Bristol Farms, Gelson's and numerous others who are focusing extensively on procuring and selling locally-produced foods in their stores.

Both California and Arizona also are top specialty, natural and organic food and grocery product producing states in the U.S. Local producers in these two states produce everything from scores of types and varieties of fresh produce and locally-raised beef, poultry and pork, to nuts, milk, cheese, wine, breads, oils, shelf-staple grocery products of every kind and more.

Tesco could have an absolute field day procuring and selling locally-produced foods in California and Arizona for its Fresh & Easy grocery stores. And, it wouldn't take all that much too succeed at it if done right.

A careful and thoughtful addition of a few locally-produced food and grocery products in every category of products in the Fresh & Easy stores would have the overall effect of making a big difference in terms of achieving that "localization" formula we discussed earlier. The category-wide local foods product mix needs to be selected carefully however.

Doing so also builds consumer loyalty. As Tesco's local foods guru Emily Shamma said about UK consumers wanting to buy locally-produced foods and support local farmers, so too do U.S. consumers want to do--and are doing--the same thing. This is particularly true among Western USA consumers in California, Nevada and Arizona, who count numerous local farmers and local food producers among their family members, friends, relatives and business associates.

Local foods procuring and advertising "locally-grown" on the menu also is big with mid-range to higher-end restaurants in the Western USA. These restaurants, especially the higher-end ones, are major food trend setters, and their local foods' initiatives have made buying and eating local even stronger among consumers in the region.

U.S. consumers also want to buy local foods for environmental, as well as for product quality and local farmer-producer-support reasons. And they're doing so. That's why local farmers' markets are so popular in the U.S., especially in the Western U.S. These local fresh fruit and vegetable farmers' markets, which also sell all sorts of other local food and grocery products, have grown by 50% in number and customer counts in just the last decade.

In California, a state with nearly 40 million people, nearly every city and small town has a farmers' market which starts in early spring and runs into the fall. Most big and medium cities even have farmers' markets that operate year-round. Further, most larger cities in the Western US have at least two or three--and often more--farmers markets, many of which operate every day of the week.

Americans also are buying local foods in significant numbers at grocery stores, as evidenced by the fast-growing trend among numerous supermarket chains, independent grocers and natural foods' retailers to stock as much of the locally-produced products as they can in their stores.

Many of these food retailers have created "local foods" shelf signs, which they put on every locally-produced product sold in their stores. These grocers also label all the local foods' items in their weekly advertising circulars with bright-colored flags which identify the advertised item as "Local."

Many of the supermarket chains, such as Whole Foods, Safeway, Raley's and others also are partnering with local farmers and local food producers directly, guaranteeing them the retailer will buy the farmers' entire crop of say sweet corn or melons in return for the exclusive marketing and selling of the local crop or products.

If you pay attention to weekly supermarket advertising circulars like we do, you'll notice in just the last year how many more chains and independents have started advertising and promoting locally-produced products every week, as well as how such major food retailers like Safeway Stores, Whole Foods Market and even mid-range chains have increased the number of local items they promote each and every week in their ads as well as in-store.

Local is big. In the Western USA, its rapidly becoming as big as organic.

The opportunity certainly exists for Tesco's Fresh & Easy Neighborhood market USA to launch a local foods initiative. After all, its stores are located in the heart of America's local foods-producing region, the Western USA. The Western U.S. also arguably is home to the most "local foods loyal" consumers in America.

Additionally, Fresh & Easy has the infrastructure and commitment to local foods' procurement and marketing from parent company Tesco's UK local initiative. All Fresh & Easy needs is a few American-bred, experienced local foods procurement and marketing experts to manage the program.

Going local is even going to be more imperative for Fresh & Easy next year when it enters the Northern and Central California markets of Bakersfield, Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay Area with about 43 or so stores, which will start opening in early 2009. Central and Northern California consumers are even more fiercely local foods-oriented than their Southern California, Nevada and Arizona neighbors.

Additionally, the economies of Central and Northern California are still heavily-based on agriculture, including small, local farmers and food producers.

Further, the "foodie" culture, especially in the 7-million resident-strong San Francisco Bay Area is increasingly demanding quality, locally-produced foods, and even in today's bad economic times a high percentage of Bay Area consumers are willing to pay a premium for foods produced locally in the region. Of course, these shoppers would love--and buy even more of--affordable local foods.

We believe an affordable local foods initiative done well, just like an affordable organic foods program executed well, could go a long way towards creating a strong identity and better positioning for Tesco's Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market USA's small-format grocery stores and the Fresh & Easy brand in general.

There currently isn't a major food retailer of note in California, Arizona and Nevada offering organic and local foods at truly affordable retail prices, except Trader Joe's to a certain extent in the organic space, on a regular basis.

We believe based on our analysis if Tesco's Fresh & Easy could accomplish those two goals--creating and sustaining solid affordable organic foods and local foods' marketing and merchandising programs--the grocery chain would be helped greatly in its goal to succeed in the highly competitive Western U.S. retail food and grocery market.